Submitted on Saturday 13th August 2011
Rejected on Wednesday 21st June 2017
Current status: Rejected
Rejection code: duplicate (see below for details)
Petitions shouldn't be accepted if they've got spelling mistakes in them
If people are going to go to the trouble of issuing ill-thought out e-petitions they should at least spell them right, or if not the actual debate should be about the question as it is spelt. For example, the e-petition 'Convicted London rioters should loose all benefits.' should spark a debate around whether the convicted London rioters should be used to set benefits free from the constraints currently placed upon them. In preparation for this debate, perhaps the creator could articulate what it is he feels these benefits need to be loosed from, and why he suggests the rioters would be best-placed to loose them.
You can't sign this petition because it was rejected. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!
The Government e-Petitions Team gave the following reason:
There's already a petition about this issue. We cannot accept a new petition when we already have one about a very similar issue.
You are more likely to get action on this issue if you sign and share a single petition.
18.119.136.235 Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:06:13 +0100
