Submitted on Monday 27th June 2016
Rejected on Monday 18th July 2016
Current status: Rejected
Rejection code: no-action (see below for details)
An official post-referendum analysis of Brexit prior to triggering Article 50
Both official campaigns made bold claims. Examine their accuracy, influence and ethical standards. Before the irreversible act of triggering Article 50, determine if the general consensus would still lead to an exit from the European Union.
There is some reason to believe that some misleading statements may have been made to voters by both campaigns (goo.gl/nl9fN6 goo.gl/IhXJMv goo.gl/ElTGEk). Further to this, EU reaction to Brexit alongside clarification of the consequences may also result in a change of opinion (goo.gl/TzzIDq goo.gl/2iQYp4). As opinions alter on both sides, it is important to consider this variability before significant action is taken.�
You can't sign this petition because it was rejected. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!
The Government e-Petitions Team gave the following reason:
We think you might be asking for the same action as this petitioner:
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/144226
18.188.227.192 Fri, 22 Nov 2024 01:18:30 +0000
