Submitted on Thursday 1st December 2011
Published on Thursday 1st December 2011
Current status: Closed
Closed: Saturday 1st December 2012
Signatures: 2
Tagged with
British ~ Individuals ~ Money
Sometimes the best way to develop a new company is starting up as a HMG owned & supported company. HMG should act as an imaginative prudent tycoon
It is a myth that anything that HMG owns do not make any money for British taxpayers & anything that private enterprises does do. Is this what is meant by the concept of the ‘state being small & individuals big’? If it was true that whatever HMG owns do not make any money, then HMG should not nationalise banks as it will not make any money/profits for taxpayers whatsoever. If privatising HMG companies (like public utilities) or even sourcing out services (like prisons, laboratories, museums) rather than running services in-house, can be profitable for private enterprises, why not for HMG herself|? Why can't the British government invest in the space and shipping industry like the USA & South Korea respectively? Infrastructure & industries like China & India? Why can’t HMG act as an imaginative entrepreneur/tycoon investing & setting up new British companies/businesses before foreign owners set them up & have the many of the available jobs effectively shipped abroad?
You can't sign this petition because it is now closed. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!
3.22.68.29 Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:30:49 +0000