Have your say on government e-petitions

HMG should decide & legislate on the confusion over priority rights of RACIAL groups vis-à-vis RELGIOUS group?

Submitted on Tuesday 17th January 2012

Rejected on Wednesday 21st June 2017

Current status: Rejected

Rejection code: no-action (see below for details)

Petition Action

HMG should decide & legislate on the confusion over priority rights of RACIAL groups vis-à-vis RELGIOUS group?

Additional Information

Which have priority or the same - racial groups practising their customs (like wearing turbans, wearing burkas) or believers’ religious observances? Sikhs/Jews an ethnic race, cult or religion? In Mandla v Dowell Lee (1983) House of Lords found that Sikhs constituted a RACIAL group when a Sikh boy was refused a place at a school because he wore a turban. The appeal was therefore allowed under Race Relations Act. This judgement was based on Sikhs long shared history & collective consciousness distinguishing them from other groups in customs, geographical origin, language, being recognised as a separate group in the surrounding community. Jews regard a person a Jew if born of Jewish mother. A person can be a Jew even if not practising Judaism. Likewise can a person be converted to Sikhism by believing in karma & reincarnation unless BORN a Sikh? Surely belief in reincarnation itself would not require a believer to start wearing turbans, bangles, ceremonial swords, long beard, etc.


You can't sign this petition because it was rejected. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!

This petition was rejected

The Government e-Petitions Team gave the following reason:

Have your say on this petition!

comments powered by Disqus

repetition.me is a Good Stuff website

3.145.59.89 Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:21:08 +0000