Have your say on government e-petitions

HMG should clarify what are RACIAL CUSTOMS (e.g. turbans, skull caps) covered by the Race Relations Act, not so covered for RELGIOUS PRACTICES

Submitted on Wednesday 8th February 2012

Rejected on Wednesday 21st June 2017

Current status: Rejected

Rejection code: no-action (see below for details)

Petition Action

HMG should clarify what are RACIAL CUSTOMS (e.g. turbans, skull caps) covered by the Race Relations Act, not so covered for RELGIOUS PRACTICES

Additional Information

Which have priority or the same - racial groups practising their customs or believers’ religious observances (like Halal slaughter)? Sikhs/Jews ethnic race, cult or religion? In Mandla v Dowell Lee (1983) House of Lords found that Sikhs constituted a RACIAL group when a Sikh boy was refused a place at a school because he wore a turban. The appeal was therefore allowed under Race Relations Act. This judgement was based on Sikhs long shared history & collective consciousness distinguishing them from other groups in customs, geographical origin, language, being recognised as a separate group in the surrounding community. Jews regard a person a Jew if born of Jewish mother. A person can be a Jew even if not practising Judaism. Surely belief in reincarnation would not require a believer to wear the insignias of Sikhism, Hinduism or Buddhism. So are they religion, race or both?


You can't sign this petition because it was rejected. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!

This petition was rejected

The Government e-Petitions Team gave the following reason:

Have your say on this petition!

comments powered by Disqus

repetition.me is a Good Stuff website

18.117.104.30 Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:38:16 +0000