Have your say on government e-petitions

Help further the overriding objective for rights claims that you are a party to

Submitted on Friday 3rd April 2020

Rejected on Tuesday 2nd June 2020

Current status: Rejected

Rejection code: no-action (see below for details)

Petition Action

Help further the overriding objective for rights claims that you are a party to

Petition Details

Civil procedure rules part 11 Disputing a courts Jurisdiction IS a Rights claim that YOU as a party involved must HELP us further to recognition & effect, when a citizen is petitioning parliament using The Right to petition 1688 Bill of rights. Petitioning is pre engaged proceedings with parliament

Additional Information

Evidence from painted chamber committee's of the 1640 Long parliament under Saye, Warwick, Bedford, Essex & Brooke prove basis why the 1688 Bill of Rights, Right to petition was enacted. To protect citizens from criminal court jurisdiction, when citizens are using policing provisions of law to investigate judges, lords, chief constables and ministers by affidavit in petition form. Where corruption, bad customs and practices are evident. We have the same Privilege of Jurisdiction as Lords & MPs


You can't sign this petition because it was rejected. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!

This petition was rejected

The Government e-Petitions Team gave the following reason:

Petitions need to call on the Government or Parliament to take a specific action.

We're not sure exactly what you'd like the Government or Parliament to do.

You could start a new petition explaining clearly what you would like the Government or Parliament to do, such as restricting courts from taking action against an individual in certain circumstances.

Have your say on this petition!

comments powered by Disqus

repetition.me is a Good Stuff website

18.223.0.53 Thu, 09 May 2024 06:59:19 +0100