Submitted on Saturday 20th June 2020
Rejected on Thursday 3rd September 2020
Current status: Rejected
Rejection code: duplicate (see below for details)
Independent Review HS2, due to further reduction in the Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)
Before commencing, Lord Berkeley, former Deputy Chair of the Oakervee Review, had his best estimate that the HS2 project has a BCR of less than 1, possibly as low 0.6
There have been further impacts on the BCR which should now be considered as costs have increased and demand has reduced
1. Red diesel is to be scrapped. Plant will have double the fuel cost. The taxpayer will not recoup contractors OHP
2. Westminsters Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has reported HS2 to be “badly off course”, phase one has risen dramatically.
3. Risk allowance is nowhere near enough, archaeological sites are being discovered
4. The basis of demand being 18 full trains per hour is false, HS2 Ltd openly admits that no other line in the world runs more than 12 – 14 trains.
5. Cost of borrowing
You can't sign this petition because it was rejected. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!
The Government e-Petitions Team gave the following reason:
There's already a petition about this issue. We cannot accept a new petition when we already have one about a very similar issue.
You are more likely to get action on this issue if you sign and share a single petition.
You may wish to sign this petition calling for the same action: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/314520
18.225.195.190 Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:39:08 +0000
