Have your say on government e-petitions

strict liability

Submitted on Monday 28th October 2013

Published on Tuesday 19th November 2013

Current status: Closed

Closed: Wednesday 19th November 2014

Signatures: 1

Tagged with

Law

Petition Action

strict liability

Additional Information

Crimes that mens rea is not needed to prove an offence are known as strict liability. To determine whether an offence is one of strict liabilty, the courts look to the wording of the statute. Although the aim of strict liabilty is to ensure public safety and enforce standards of behaviour, it also has a lot of problems like the fact that there is no clarity in law for "strict", there are convictions without proof of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence. Although strict liability is allowed so as to promote enforcement of the law, deterrence/raise standards and it's easier to administer, the penalty for strict liability is too strict This is most common with driving offences which are crimes of strict liabilty. It doesn't necessarily act as a deterrent. People do not comply to avoid criminal prosecution given how strict the penalty for strict liability is. The penalty for strict liability should be reduced because from what I can see, it does not serve a lot of it's purpose.


You can't sign this petition because it is now closed. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!

Have your say on this petition!

comments powered by Disqus

repetition.me is a Good Stuff website

3.21.46.24 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:02:07 +0000