Submitted on Wednesday 27th January 2021
Rejected on Thursday 11th February 2021
Current status: Rejected
Rejection code: no-action (see below for details)
We want the Govt to explain why no SUPERMAJORITY was set for the EU Referendum.
We want to know why govt did not agree that the EU referendum should have a super-maj or a devolution lock and at what point did the referendum become mandatory without them?
We want it to answer factually the points raised in the attached letter to Michael Gove about corruption in the referendum.
David Lidington rejected a super-maj because the ref was advisory. (Confirmed by the Supreme Court and in Briefing Paper on the Bill)
The status of the ref is further called into question by corruption, as set out in the attached letter
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-06-16/debates/15061658000001/EuropeanUnionReferendumBill?highlight=%22threshold%22#contribution-15061658000526
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0196.html
https://brexitrage.com/influence-and-persuasion/
You can't sign this petition because it was rejected. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!
The Government e-Petitions Team gave the following reason:
Petitions need to call on the Government or Parliament to take a specific action. We're not sure exactly what you'd like the Government or Parliament to do.
3.128.203.75 Mon, 18 Nov 2024 04:43:35 +0000
