Submitted on Friday 7th November 2025
Rejected on Friday 12th December 2025
Current status: Rejected
Rejection code: duplicate (see below for details)
We dont think that pay per mile has legitimate aims of revenue only & oppose it
We oppose the Chancellors Pay per Mile on the basis that it violates the right to privacy article 8 of the Human Rights act 1998 & therefore we do not want it introduced. The only legitimate aim of taxation is £ & there.is no need to implement our personal tavel details & information Into revenue.
On Page 103 of the Blackstones guide to the Human Rights Act 1998 by John Wadham & Helen Mountfield
It states these criteria for the test of article 8:
(a) that an interference corresponds to a pressing social need (Sunday Times v United Kingdom);
(b) that it is proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued.
There is no social need for pay per mile, the existing system works fine.
We believe the government has ulterior motives in addition to taxation moving us towards a China Gov model
You can't sign this petition because it was rejected. But you can still comment on it here at Repetition.me!
The Government e-Petitions Team gave the following reason:
There's already a petition about this issue. We cannot accept a new petition when we already have one about a very similar issue.
You are more likely to get action on this issue if you sign and share a single petition.
Do not introduce pay-per-mile road charging for UK drivers: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/749667
216.73.217.176 Thu, 16 Jul 2026 02:44:53 +0100
